News & Announcements » 2026-2027 Community Schools Implementation Plan

2026-2027 Community Schools Implementation Plan

 

 

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM:
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Instructions

This California Community Schools Partnership Program (CCSPP) Implementation Plan Template has been created by the State Transformational Assistance Center for Community Schools (S-TAC), in partnership with the California Department of Education (CDE). This template was designed to support implementation applicants with the requirement of submitting an implementation plan (per site) as part of their Request For Application and to support CCSPP grantees with community school implementation more generally. It should be considered a dynamic document that is periodically updated to reflect the progress and needs of your community school(s), legislative updates, and course corrections informed by your continuous improvement and school community engagement processes. The Local Education Agency (LEA) is referenced throughout the template to encourage collaboration between the LEA and sites on the implementation of the CCSPP.

The Implementation Plan should be guided by the California Community Schools Framework (CA CS Framework) and the Capacity-Building Strategies: A Developmental Rubric. To build on existing objectives for community schools, alignment with overarching LEA goals and objectives as stated on Local Control and Accountability Plans (LCAPs) and School Plans for Student Achievement (SPSAs) is strongly recommended.

LEAs and school sites must work collaboratively with community partners, including families/caregivers, staff, students, district leaders, inter-agency representatives, etc., to develop and review the CCSPP Implementation Plan. The Lead LEA, working with school sites, is responsible for the plan and the oversight of any community partners or subcontractors. The LEA should include any partners in the development and review of the plan. It is recommended that the plan be reviewed biannually (twice a year), at least. Note that the Implementation Plan Template asks you to focus on the critical processes that each school and LEA must develop in order to execute the vision of community schools in order to achieve desired outcomes. The Annual Progress Report (APR) will ask grantees to reflect upon and report on those outcomes.

The Implementation Plan will be submitted to CDE as part of the Cohort 3 Implementation Grant by those who are applying. This Implementation Plan Template will be updated as the CCSPP accountability system is developed.

CA CS Framework Overview

A community school is any school serving pre-Kindergarten through high school students through a  “whole-child” approach, with an integrated focus on academics, health and social services, youth and community development, and community engagement. It is an equity-driven and assets-building school transformation program.

Adopted in 2022, the CA CS Framework identifies 4 Pillars of Community Schools, Key Conditions for Learning, Cornerstone Commitments, and Proven Practices as follows:

Pillars of Community Schools: Integrated Student Supports; Family and Community Engagement; Collaborative Leadership and Practices for Educators and Administrators and; Extended Learning Time and Opportunities

Key Conditions for Learning in a Community School: Supportive environmental conditions that foster strong relationships and community; Productive instructional strategies that support motivation, competence, and self-directed learning; Social and emotional learning (SEL) that fosters skills, habits, and mindsets that enable academic progress, efficacy, and productive behavior, and; System of supports that enable healthy development, respond to student needs, and address learning barriers.

Cornerstone Commitments of Community Schools: A commitment to assets-driven and strength-based practice; A commitment to racially just and restorative school climates; A commitment to powerful, culturally proficient and relevant instruction; and a commitment to shared decision making and participatory practices.

Proven Practices of Community Schools: Community Asset Mapping and Gap Analysis; A Community School Coordinator; Site-Based and LEA-Based Advisory Councils, and Integrating and Aligning with Other Relevant Programs.

The California Community Schools Framework is synthesized through the Overarching Values and operationalized through the Capacity-Building Strategies: A Developmental Rubric.

More information about these key concepts or community school components can be found at https://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/yr22/documents/jan22item02a1.docx and at https://www.acoe.org/Page/2461, including the CA CS Framework.

Capacity-Building Strategies Overview

The S-TAC has launched the Capacity-Building Strategies: A Developmental Rubric to serve as a road map for both LEAs and school sites and is meant to enhance the adoption, implementation and sustainability of community schools. The Capacity-Building Strategies include a focus on:

  1. Shared Commitment, Understanding and Priorities
  2. Centering Community-based Learning
  3. Collaborative Leadership
  4. Sustaining Staff and Resources
  5. Strategic Community Partnerships

 

The Developmental Rubric can be accessed here, and is best used as a side-by-side companion document as grantees are completing this implementation plan.

 

CCSPP: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

School Site Contact Information

Coliseum St. Elementary School

Principal: Susannah Yorke- Washington

CS Coordinator: Melissa Meikle

Email: [email protected]

Strategies, Priorities and Goals

Describe the main process goals and action steps for the school site’s community schools initiative. Add lines as needed. Use the phase-specific activities outlined in the Developmental Rubric as a guide.

 

Strategy 1: Shared Commitment, Understanding, and Priorities

When interest-holders unite in a shared understanding of and commitment to the community

school strategy, it drives democratic collaboration and transparency. Deep listening and authentic

relationship-building (via a robust Needs and Assets Assessment process) are critical to identifying

collective priorities and for monitoring progress towards meeting shared goals.

 

Part A: Shared Commitment, Understanding and Priorities Built Around the Overarching Values

After engaging interest-holders to answer the question, “why a community school for my school?”, share your response to that question in the box below. In your response, be sure to Indicate how your site’s understanding of community schools reflects its commitment to the CA CS Framework through the Overarching Values (Overarching Values can be accessed here):

  1. Racially-just, relationship-centered spaces
  2. Shared power
  3. Classroom-community connections
  4. A focus on continuous improvement and possibility thinking

Describe the developmental plans for ensuring these values are reflected in your community schools work:

As a second-year Community School in the Engaging phase, Coliseum Street Elementary continued building foundational systems centered on relationship-building, stakeholder engagement, and shared understanding of community needs. Through surveys, meetings, interviews, and collaboration with SSC, ELAC, LSLC, and CSIT, the school strengthened opportunities for family, staff, and student voice while using data to reflect on priorities and areas for growth. During the implementation year, Whole Child indicators, attendance trends, SPSA priorities, School Experience Survey (SES) results, and stakeholder feedback were used to guide reflection and action planning. Chronic absenteeism decreased from 43% to 29.6%, reflecting the impact of attendance supports, targeted outreach, and increased student and family engagement efforts. Recent SES data reflected continued strengths in family engagement, relationships, communication, and student voice, while also identifying ongoing areas for growth related to staff morale, collaborative leadership, and consistency of stakeholder participation in decision-making processes.

Communication, Family Engagement, and Shared Leadership

●      Conversations and stakeholder feedback informed improvements in communication, including the development of a weekly bilingual school newsletter launched in November to increase accessibility of information for families. These efforts reflect a shift toward more intentional, data-informed engagement and lay the foundation for expanded shared decision-making.

●      An initial Parent Leadership Group was formed in October to strengthen family engagement and gather feedback connected to school priorities. While the group was not sustained consistently, the effort resulted in increased engagement from several families.

●      One bilingual parent leader strengthened her involvement through participation in CSIT and LSLC, co-development of the weekly family newsletter, and attendance at district events as a parent representative for Coliseum Street Elementary.

●      Families continued engaging through Coffee with the Principal meetings, SSC, ELAC, surveys, workshops, and school events designed to increase accessibility, transparency, and participation in school initiatives and decision-making.

●      Additional family engagement was supported through culturally relevant student opportunities, including the creation of the Coliseum drill team in March through T-Grant funding coordinated by the Community School Representative. The program created additional opportunities for student participation and increased engagement from several Black families through school events and activities.

●      CSIT continued serving as a space for implementation reflection, stakeholder input, and ongoing discussion connected to Community Schools priorities, while LSLC continued serving as the school’s primary shared decision-making body.

School Climate, Inclusion, and Staff Capacity-Building

●      Existing Leader in Me structures continued serving as part of the foundation for PBIS, calming corners in classrooms, and relationship-centered practices.

●      Student voice continued developing through leadership opportunities, morning announcements, student-led activities, and use of the Leader in Me Measurable Results Assessment (MRA). MRA data reflected growth in areas connected to school goals, leadership, and student well-being, helping inform reflection and continuous improvement conversations.

●      The school continued strengthening PBIS implementation and long-term school climate systems that support student leadership, positive school culture, and inclusive practices, with ongoing goals toward achieving PBIS Gold recognition.

●      Staff professional development and schoolwide activities promoted inclusivity and affirmed student identity through observances such as Hispanic Heritage, Black History Month, Women’s History Month, AANHPI Heritage Month, LGBTQ+ awareness learning, inclusive texts, and student-led announcements.

●      Staff participation in Joyful Disruption professional learning increased during the year; however, many staff members have not yet completed JD 2.0, and schoolwide consistency related to EGI implementation and integration remained relatively unchanged.

Community-Based Learning and PBL

●      Following staff input and a democratic voting process, the Defined Learning platform was adopted, and a PBL Champion was secured to support implementation.

●      Collaboration and planning structures supported teachers in beginning early PBL implementation across several classrooms.

●      Student PBL projects were showcased during the 2nd Annual Community Schools PBL Showcase, as well as during the school’s Open House and Science Fair, providing opportunities for students to share learning connected to real-world experiences.

●      Staff feedback also reflected ongoing challenges balancing PBL implementation alongside the instructional demands of CKLA and other curriculum expectations.

●      Expanding teacher capacity, sustainability, and instructional alignment connected to Community-Based Learning will remain ongoing areas of focus.

Community Partnerships and Student Supports

●      Existing partnerships continued supporting student wellness, enrichment, attendance, and school engagement efforts throughout the implementation year.

●      This year, the Community School Coordinator (CSC) was intentional in beginning conversations with T-Funded partnerships through one-on-one conversations, check-ins, and surveys to better understand partner capacity, communication, and alignment with school priorities and student needs.

●      A new partnership was established with Citizens and Friends of Trinidad and Tobago (CFTT), a nonprofit organization representing the Caribbean community, which provided clothing donations and essential items to support students through the school clothing closet.

●      The partnership helped address basic student needs connected to school participation and well-being, and CFTT will continue supporting efforts to replenish the school clothing closet moving forward.

Ongoing Areas for Growth

●      Strengthening consistency of stakeholder engagement and participation

●      Increasing collaborative leadership and shared ownership structures

●      Improving staff morale and participation in decision-making processes

●      Strengthening consistency of EGI implementation and integration

●      Expanding sustainable Community-Based Learning practices across classrooms

●      Continuing alignment between partnerships, school priorities, and identified student and family needs

Moving forward, the school will continue using stakeholder feedback, survey data, and collaborative reflection processes to strengthen alignment across Community Schools priorities and implementation efforts.

 

 

Part B: As part of the planning process, you have gone through an initial process of understanding needs and assets. As you initiate the implementation grant process and obtain site-level resources, please reflect on how you will go deeper in this needs and asset assessment process to engage the entire community in identifying their top community school priorities and vision. Please reflect on how you will engage different groups (administrators, certificated staff, classified staff, students, family members, community members, and community partners) and identify the processes (e.g., surveys, one-on-one interviews, focus groups, visioning exercises, meetings/forums, etc.) you will use to engage them. Describe how you will engage historically marginalized student and family groups.

 

As Coliseum Street Elementary moves further into implementation, the school is building on the Needs and Assets Assessment conducted during the planning year by deepening both the reach and consistency of engagement across the school community. During the 2025–26 implementation year, data from Whole Child indicators, attendance trends, SPSA priorities, School Experience Survey results, and stakeholder feedback were used to guide action and monitor progress. Chronic absenteeism steadily decreased from 43% to 29.6%, reflecting the impact of coordinated systems, including the attendance team, targeted outreach, and student and family engagement efforts. Recent School Experience Survey data also reflected continued strengths in family engagement, communication, and student voice, while identifying ongoing areas for growth related to collaborative leadership, staff morale, and stakeholder participation in decision-making. While these outcomes demonstrate meaningful progress, they also highlight the importance of strengthening consistency in engagement, reflection, and shared ownership across stakeholder groups.

During implementation, administrators, certificated staff, and classified staff were engaged through meetings, surveys, and data discussions; however, participation was uneven. School Experience Survey data identified collaborative leadership and staff participation in decision-making as continued areas for growth, reinforcing the need for stronger systems that support staff voice, communication, and shared ownership. Moving forward, the school will establish quarterly staff feedback cycles centered on the Capacity-Building Strategies, along with more structured data discussions, empathy interviews, and collaborative planning spaces to increase participation and strengthen staff engagement across all groups.

Student voice was incorporated through leadership opportunities and the Leader in Me Measurable Results Assessment (MRA), which provides age-appropriate survey data for students in grades 3–5. School Experience Survey and MRA data reflected growth in student voice and leadership opportunities during the current year. To deepen this work, the school will administer the MRA in both the fall and spring to strengthen data cycles and will expand opportunities for student input through classroom discussions, student forums, enrichment opportunities, and leadership activities connected to school culture and decision-making.

Family engagement showed continued strengths through the Parent Leadership Group, where families reviewed School Experience Survey data and participated in root cause analysis, leading to improved communication efforts such as the school newsletter. School Experience Survey data also reflected strong family participation, communication, and feelings of inclusion in school activities and decision-making. To expand participation and accessibility, the school will provide workshops connected to the Leader in Me framework, i-Ready, school initiatives, and volunteer development so families can more meaningfully engage in schoolwide learning and feedback processes. Additional engagement opportunities will include focus groups, listening sessions, SSC and ELAC structures, Coffee with the Principal meetings, and informal relationship-centered spaces designed to increase accessibility and participation.

Community partners were engaged through one-on-one conversations, partnership surveys, and initial data discussions to assess alignment between services and student needs. Moving forward, partners will be engaged more consistently through quarterly partnership meetings, ongoing communication, and reflection sessions focused on attendance, engagement, wellness, and school climate priorities. The school will also strengthen the role of CSIT through consistent monthly meetings focused on implementation, reflection, and coordination of Community Schools priorities, while LSLC will continue serving as the school’s primary shared decision-making body.

To ensure historically marginalized students and families are meaningfully engaged, Coliseum will continue expanding multilingual communication, offering flexible meeting formats and times, and using relationship-based outreach strategies that reduce barriers and build trust. Efforts will include increasing language access beyond English and Spanish and creating culturally responsive engagement opportunities that reflect the identities and experiences of the school community.

Moving forward, input from all stakeholder groups will continue to be intentionally synthesized through CSIT and other leadership structures to identify shared priorities and strengthen alignment across Community Schools efforts. This next phase will continue strengthening the Needs and Assets Assessment as an ongoing cycle of listening, reflection, and action that more fully centers the voices, experiences, and priorities of the entire school community.

 

Part C: As sites complete the needs and asset assessment process, they identify collective priorities that form the initial focus of their community school implementation efforts. Given your preliminary needs and asset assessment, please share three draft collective priorities that you anticipate arising as you achieve deeper engagement with students, staff, families and community members.

 

One of the priorities should align with a support listed in the Whole Child and Family Supports Inventory (e.g., integrated student supports, authentic family and community engagement, collaborative leadership, extended learning time and opportunities, positive and restorative school climate, community-based curriculum and pedagogy, etc.). The collective priorities you list below may be the same goals you will ultimately report in the APR, or they may change throughout the course of your first year as you continually engage students, staff, families and community members.

 

Draft Collective Priority

Outcome/Indicators you aim to improve

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will increase opportunities for students to participate in enrichment, leadership, and school-connected activities, increasing positive student responses to “There are lots of chances for students to get involved in sports, clubs, or other activities” on the School Experience Survey.

• Increase positive student responses to “There are lots of chances for students to get involved in sports, clubs, or other activities” on the School Experience Survey from 75% to 82%.

• Increase participation in school-connected enrichment, wellness, leadership, and showcase opportunities.

• Strengthen coordination, visibility, and communication of student activities through partnerships, after-school programming, and schoolwide planning.

 

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will increase stakeholder use of organizational communication tools, including ClassDojo and Schoology, to strengthen communication, accessibility, and feedback loops between school and home.

 

• Increase stakeholder engagement with ClassDojo by 10%, measured through communication participation and engagement data.

• Increase staff use of Schoology for communication and organization by 25%, measured through staff feedback surveys and implementation monitoring.

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will increase student voice in shaping school culture and decision-making, increasing positive student responses to “Students have a voice in decision-making at this school” on the School Experience Survey from 71% to 78% and improving Student Empowerment scores on the Leader in Me MRA from 83 to 86.

 

• Increase positive student responses to “Students have a voice in decision-making at this school” on the School Experience Survey from 71% to 78% by June 2027.

• Improve Student Empowerment scores on the Leader in Me MRA from 83 to 86.

• Increase evidence of student input informing school climate activities, leadership opportunities, and schoolwide decision-making processes.

 

 

 

 

Strategy 2: Centering Community-Based Learning

Community-Based Learning (CBL) builds on the rich, diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds of

students, families, and educators. Delivered in learning environments that are

relationship-centered and ensure a sense of belonging, CBL builds on community assets, cultural

wealth, funds of knowledge, and indigenous ways of knowing. Community-Based Learning is

powerful instruction that increases student engagement by connecting classroom learning to

real-life experiences and to issues that are relevant to students’ lives and communities, improving

their sense of ownership and agency.

 

Describe your goals and action steps to assist educators in learning about students and families as well as understanding the theoretical roots and practical elements of community-based learning.

Site Level Goals and Measures of Progress

Goals

Action Steps

By June 2027, participating teachers at Coliseum Street Elementary will implement standards-aligned Community-Based Learning projects connected to ELA and/or Math and real-world community contexts to increase student engagement, relevance, and authentic learning opportunities. 

• Increase use of culturally responsive, student-centered instruction aligned to the EGI rubric through Community- and Project-Based Learning implementation.

• 6–8 teachers will complete Defined Learning training and collaborative planning opportunities.

• Participating teachers will implement at least two PBL experiences per semester, including one Community-Based Learning experience connected to ELA and/or Math.

• Student learning experiences will be showcased through events such as Open House, the Science Fair, and the Community Schools PBL Showcase.

Allocate time and supportive resources for teachers to collaboratively plan curriculum and integrate learning experiences that strengthen classroom-community connections annually through T-Fund planning opportunities and Community-Based Learning implementation.

• Provide collaborative planning opportunities through T-Fund-supported planning and reflection spaces connected to Community-Based Learning implementation.

• Develop student reflection and collaboration tools that support classroom-community connections and student voice within Community-Based Learning experiences.

• Participating teachers will document Community-Based Learning implementation through lesson plans, student collaboration activities, and reflection artifacts.

 

 

 

During the 2026–27 school year, Coliseum Street Elementary will focus on strengthening educators' understanding of Community-Based Learning (CBL) by building knowledge of students, families, and community contexts alongside the instructional foundations that support culturally responsive and engaging learning experiences. This work aligns with the school’s broader priorities of improving student engagement, strengthening belonging, increasing student voice, and expanding authentic learning opportunities through relationship-centered practices.

To support this work, educators will participate in professional learning connected to the core principles of Community-Based Learning, including culturally sustaining pedagogy, funds of knowledge, student voice, and community-connected instruction. Professional learning will build on existing EGI and Joyful Disruption work to strengthen shared understanding of equitable and culturally responsive instructional practices. Teachers participating in early CBL implementation will also engage in collaborative planning opportunities supported through Defined Learning, PBL planning structures, T-Fund-supported planning opportunities, and ongoing reflection aligned to the EGI rubric.

Educators will deepen understanding of students and families through activities such as student interest surveys, classroom discussions, reflection activities, and family engagement opportunities that highlight community strengths, cultural assets, and lived experiences. Staff will also begin incorporating community contexts and real-world connections into standards-aligned learning experiences, particularly in ELA and Math, to strengthen relevance, engagement, and student ownership of learning.

Family and community engagement will support this process through opportunities for families, partners, and local organizations to share experiences, perspectives, and resources that inform classroom learning and strengthen school-community connections. Student voice will continue to be elevated through leadership opportunities, project-based learning experiences, classroom collaboration structures, and reflection activities that allow students to share interests, questions, and community concerns connected to their lived experiences and school community.

Through these action steps, Coliseum will continue building educator readiness, instructional coherence, and shared understanding of Community-Based Learning while increasing opportunities for engaging, culturally relevant, and community-connected learning experiences across grade levels.

 

Strategy 3: Collaborative Leadership

Shared decision-making ensures all interest-holders have a voice in the transformation process and fosters shared power of the strategy. Collaborative leadership improves coordination of services, fosters supportive relationships, results in decisions that are widely accepted and implemented, and supports sustainability of the effort.

At the system level, LEAs establish a system-level steering committee/advisory council to conduct exploration activities and to provide crucial guidance to school-level implementers. At the site level, schools map and assess the current shared governance structures (where and how decisions are made) in their building and community, identifying all existing school-site and local neighborhood teams, networks, or working groups to understand their purpose and composition. Schools then launch or revise site-level shared leadership structure(s) to facilitate democratic participation and decision-making among students, staff, families, and community members.

Describe your goals for strengthening collaborative leadership.

 

Site Level Goals and Measures of Progress

Goals

Action Steps

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will strengthen sustainable family engagement and leadership capacity through ongoing workshops, volunteer development, and family learning opportunities connected to school priorities and student learning.  

• Provide family workshops connected to Leader in Me, i-Ready, and school-based programs and partnerships.

• Develop volunteer training opportunities aligned to school and student needs at Coliseum Street Elementary.

• Strengthen collaboration and communication between CSIT, LSLC, student leadership, and the Parent Leadership Group to support shared reflection and engagement around Community Schools priorities.

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will strengthen representation, participation, and communication across Community Schools leadership structures, including CSIT, LSLC, student leadership, and the Parent Leadership Group.

• Maintain consistent monthly CSIT meetings focused on Community Schools priorities, stakeholder feedback, and data reflection.

• Re-establish the Parent Leadership Group and maintain monthly meetings focused on family voice, communication, and school priorities.

• Strengthen communication and stakeholder participation through organizational tools such as ClassDojo, Schoology, newsletters, and the school website.

 

Describe the system of shared governance and site-level leadership structure at your community school (this could be a visual like an organizational chart of other graphic):

Describe SSC: SSC reviews and approves schoolwide plans, budgets, and SPSA goals while incorporating stakeholder feedback and student achievement data into school planning processes.

Describe ELAC: ELAC provides input on programs and services that support multilingual learners and family engagement while advising on schoolwide priorities connected to attendance and student achievement.

Describe CSIT: CSIT supports implementation, reflection, coordination, and continuous improvement of Community Schools priorities through stakeholder collaboration and data discussions.

Describe LSLC: LSLC serves as the school’s primary shared decision-making body and supports collaborative planning, schoolwide communication, and alignment of school priorities.

Describe any other local governance structures at the school

Student Council: Student Council provides opportunities for student leadership, voice, and participation in school culture and schoolwide activities. Students support leadership initiatives, school events, peer engagement activities, and opportunities for student feedback connected to school climate and community-building efforts.

Strategy 4: Sustaining Staff and Resources

A focus on staffing and sustainability ensures that the necessary human and financial resources are available to maintain the strategy over time, and to sustain continuous progress and improvement.

Describe your goals and action steps for ensuring that: staffing serves the target student population, LEAs recruit and hire diverse, multilingual staff to support site-level work, including an LEA-level Community School Director/Coordinator. Schools hire site-level coordinators. Both sites and systems develop sustainability plans to ensure core staffing is sustained through long-term funding.

Site Level Goals and Measures of Progress

Goals

Action Steps

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will increase positive staff responses to the School Experience Survey statement, “I enjoy coming to work at this school,” from 48.2% to 60% through strengthened staff appreciation systems, wellness supports, collaboration opportunities, and increased opportunities for staff voice, feedback, and shared decision-making.

Develop a consistent system for faculty and staff recognition and appreciation.

Conduct empathy interviews, focus groups, and informal surveys to monitor staff morale, working conditions, and campus climate.

Provide Schoology support workshops and quarterly wellness-focused professional learning opportunities.

Create opportunities for families and students to recognize and celebrate faculty and staff contributions.

Increase opportunities for collaborative planning, reflection, and relationship-building among staff.

Continue strengthening relationship-centered school culture practices aligned to PBIS and Leader in Me.

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will establish regular systems for staff reflection on school culture and climate, working conditions, and staff satisfaction data through feedback cycles, collaborative discussions, and wellness-focused reflection spaces that support a whole-teacher approach and strengthen staff morale, belonging, and collaboration.

Facilitate regular reflection and feedback discussions through CSIT and staff collaboration meetings focused on school culture, climate, and working conditions.

 

Review stakeholder feedback, School Experience Survey data, and wellness trends to guide continuous improvement and staff support efforts.

 

Host quarterly wellness-focused professional learning and reflection opportunities for staff.

 

Conduct empathy interviews, focus groups, and informal staff feedback opportunities to strengthen staff voice and shared ownership.

 

Develop consistent faculty and staff appreciation and recognition systems that promote positive school culture and morale.

 

 

 

Key Staff/Personnel

Susannah Yorke-Washington

Principal/Co-Chair of LSLC

Kershunda Ballomy

UTLA Chapter Chair/LSLC Co-Chair/Special Education Teacher

Melissa Meikle

Community Schools Coordinator

Cheryl Fabien

Title I Coordinator

Jennifer Hammer

GATE Coordinator/ LSLC Member

Mendoza

Literacy Interventionist

Bridgette Blue

Numeracy Interventionist

Katherine Boonstra

 LSLC Member-Secretary/Transitional Kinder Teacher

Linda Herrera

Teacher/CSIT Member/PBL Champion

Christopher Sanco

Attendance Counselor/CSIT Member/ Attendance Team

Dillingham/Tyson

Psychiatric Social Worker

Dr. Amber Wilton

2nd Grade teacher/ Testing Coordinator/CAP/Robotics

Ameenah Gamble

Community School Community Representative/CSIT Member

 

Describe the plans or steps you are considering to build sustainability beyond the life of your implementation grant:

Coliseum Street Elementary is approaching sustainability by focusing on relationship-building, leadership development, staff capacity, and systems that can continue beyond the life of the implementation grant. Rather than relying solely on grant-funded support, the school is working to strengthen internal structures, collaboration, and shared ownership so Community Schools practices become integrated into the school culture and daily operations.

A key area of sustainability is developing leadership capacity among staff, families, and students. The school will continue strengthening the Community School Implementation Team (CSIT), Parent Leadership Group, and student leadership opportunities to increase representation, participation, and shared ownership of Community Schools priorities and schoolwide decision-making. Staff capacity for Community-Based Learning and relationship-centered practices will also continue developing through ongoing collaboration, Defined Learning implementation, EGI-aligned instructional practices, wellness-focused reflection opportunities, and the development of teacher leaders, including emerging Community-Based Learning Champions.

As part of sustaining school culture and climate efforts, Coliseum Street Elementary will continue strengthening systems aligned to PBIS and Leader in Me implementation to support a positive, relationship-centered learning environment for students and staff. Building on the school’s PBIS Silver recognition, future efforts will focus on increasing consistency across Tier 1 practices, strengthening restorative and relationship-centered approaches, expanding student leadership opportunities, and improving stakeholder perceptions connected to school climate, belonging, communication, and collaboration. These efforts support the school’s broader commitment to continuous improvement, staff wellness, and sustainable systems that promote positive school culture over time, including continued growth toward Gold-level PBIS implementation.

Family engagement sustainability will focus on increasing family understanding of school systems, student learning, and volunteer opportunities through workshops connected to Leader in Me, i-Ready, and school programs and partnerships. Volunteer training and leadership development opportunities will help families build confidence, strengthen participation, and increase understanding of how to support schoolwide efforts over time.

The school is also working to strengthen long-term partnership alignment by deepening relationships with community organizations that support student wellness, enrichment, attendance, engagement, and culturally responsive learning opportunities. Partners will continue participating in collaborative planning, reflection conversations, and data discussions to better align resources and services with identified student and family needs.

In addition, the school will continue using data-informed reflection processes, including Whole Child indicators, attendance data, School Experience Survey results, MRA data, and stakeholder feedback, to monitor progress and guide sustainability planning. Through these combined efforts, Coliseum aims to build systems, leadership structures, and collaborative relationships that strengthen shared ownership and sustain Community Schools work beyond the grant period.

Strategy 5: Strategic Community Partnerships

Developing strategic community partnerships allows schools and LEAs to build a stronger network of support and culturally responsive programming and resources for students, educators and families, and to foster a more inclusive, democratic and supportive learning environment that benefits everyone in the community.

In alignment with strategies developed in response to the deep needs and asset assessment, schools identify and establish school-community partnerships who share a holistic focus on students, families and the community. This section should demonstrate your goals and action steps to ensure community partners are actively involved in the planning, development, and continuous improvement of the community school.

Site Level Goals and Measures of Progress

Goals

Action Steps

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will strengthen alignment and collaboration with community partners through consistent reflection, communication, and shared planning connected to school priorities and identified student needs.

• Engage partners through regular check-ins, collaboration meetings, and CSIT reflection conversations focused on school priorities and service alignment.

• Use stakeholder feedback, attendance trends, and Whole Child data to assess partnership relevance, identify service gaps, and guide continuous improvement efforts.

By June 2027, Coliseum Street Elementary will

implement a system for collecting stakeholder

feedback and reviewing the impact of contracted

services through surveys, partnership reflection

meetings, and data discussions aligned to student

engagement, wellness, attendance, and family

support priorities.

• Review stakeholder feedback, attendance trends, and Whole Child data during CSIT and partnership reflection meetings to guide service alignment and continuous improvement.

• Clarify shared partnership goals, roles, and expectations to strengthen coordination, communication, and consistency of services.

 

Describe the partnerships you have established or plan to establish, and how your school’s partnerships will be responsive to the vision and priorities of students, staff, families and community members:

At Coliseum Street Elementary, strategic community partnerships are an important component of the school’s Community Schools vision and are aligned to priorities identified through the Needs and Assets Assessment process, including student engagement, attendance improvement, school climate, wellness, academic support, and authentic family engagement. The school’s Community Schools vision centers on creating a relationship-centered and inclusive school community where shared leadership, culturally responsive practices, integrated supports, and aligned partnerships work together to strengthen student engagement, belonging, and overall well-being. Partnerships are intended to support the Whole Child by connecting students and families to culturally responsive opportunities, relationship-centered supports, enrichment opportunities, and engaging learning experiences.

Current partnerships support multiple areas of the school community. Academic and mentoring support are provided through partnerships such as City Year and College Bound 4 Kids (BSAP), which support student engagement, intervention, relationship-building, leadership development, and academic enrichment. Wellness and enrichment opportunities are supported through organizations such as CF Fitness/Psychomotor and Enrich LA, which provide physical wellness and garden-based learning opportunities that strengthen belonging and student engagement. Instructional and leadership capacity-building is supported through partnerships such as Defined Learning, which supports Community- and Project-Based Learning implementation, All For One Project, which provides teacher mentorship and instructional support, and Leader in Me, which contributes to PBIS implementation and student leadership development. Brennan Cassidy also supports daily supervision and school climate efforts. Together, these partnerships contribute to expanded student supports, increased engagement opportunities, and stronger alignment between schoolwide priorities and student services.

As the school moves into the next phase of implementation, partnerships will continue strengthening through more intentional alignment, communication, reflection, and continuous improvement processes. Partners will engage through CSIT, collaboration meetings, and ongoing reflection conversations focused on school priorities, student needs, service alignment, and stakeholder feedback. Feedback from students, families, staff, and partners, gathered through surveys, focus groups, leadership discussions, School Experience Survey data, and collaborative leadership structures, will continue guiding adjustments to partnership supports and helping ensure services remain responsive to the evolving needs of the school community.

Looking ahead, Coliseum Street Elementary will continue strengthening partnerships connected to academic support, wellness, attendance improvement, multilingual family engagement, enrichment opportunities, and culturally responsive student and family support. Through continued collaboration, shared reflection, and relationship-building, the school is working to ensure that community partners function as active collaborators in supporting a more inclusive, responsive, and sustainable Community Schools model.

 

Developed by the California Department of Education and State Transformational Assistance Center, April 2024.